Trivia: The packages went out this morning. Then, we treated ourselves to coffee and a croissant. Only one more batch of cookies to go (unless I make myself some chocolate chip ones) and a few packages to wrap.
Lessons from My Reading: Bone by Bone progresses but haven't had any blocks of time to read. 500 pages (I think) and dense characterization needs concentration so you can figure out what's going on. I'm far enough in that some of the secrets suspects are hiding don't all pertain to the murder of the MC's brother. Then, there's the extra corpse in the grave. Ya gotta love it.
To fill in the time -- during commercials and talking heads during the news -- I've been reading P. D. James' Talking about Detective Fiction. Some where I think I read that it was a fund-raiser for some Oxford library which is good since as a book, it's over-priced. The piece reminded me of the talks of Sandra Dallas, a Colorado fiction writer of note. Whatever, James gives a good summary of the development of detective fiction as a sub-category of crime fiction. She also delivers a good pep talk for the importance of characterization.
Progress: Mariah ... Nothing like a 'trunk novel' popping out of the blue. Or, is that the 'little grey cells'?
While I was dinking with my query for Demons, out popped a new take on Dark Solstice, the first of my Austel's Idiot trilogy. I've revised the manuscript and have it out on submission to an e-publisher. Sort of forgot about it after I put Tangled on the shelf. (The second manuscript in the triology.) -- I still have two months before I'll hear anything. Yeah, I'm expecting a rejection though other rejections said it had some good writing.
Demons ... I've submitted it to a few agents and already got one rejection (I really like the simplicity of e-submissions.) -- I don't think I'll sell this one either since some might think it skirts the edge of blasphemy. Oh, well, but I like my fuddy gargoyles. -- The main character is a human female teen with anger issues.
Now if I can stop dinking with the last three sentences ...
Emma ... Have begun revising my print out. The thing is surprising me. Either my critiquers took care of most of my problems or I've learned something about writing over the last five years. I'm finding I have to add stuff rather than delete. Maybe, I'll end up doing another revision where I delete like mad. Ugh
Showing posts with label P. D. James. Show all posts
Showing posts with label P. D. James. Show all posts
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Brrrrrrrrrrrrrrr..... & Bummer
Trivia: Did errands and treated ourselves to lunch out after staying inside yesterday. Tomorrow we have to go out again. While prancing through the snow, a lens dropped out of my glasses. (No, it wasn't in the car.) Gotta get it replaced.
Lessons from My Reading: Almost through with Carol O'Connell's Bone by Bone. What a lovely bunch of twisting characters. (I'm pea soup green with envy.) I count five main characters, a couple of which could be the perp in the brother's death. Plus, the several secondary characters are just as finely drawn ... with a couple more possible suspects. So far, the guy with the strongest motive (getting the sh*t beat out of him by the MC/detective/suspect) hasn't appeared on the stage much. Have some 100 pages left to go. Really like the CBI agent -- who I think of as a cross between Miss Marple and and a gamer -- who's kicking the sheriff's butt.
Think of Cold Case on steroids here. You couldn't possibly fit all the characters into a 45 minute TV show. (The rest of the hour is eaten up by commercials. Maybe this is a reason so many book adaptations fall on their face when compared to the books???)
Thinking of all the character development and motivations twisting around the inter-relationships, I can just see the overlapping plot board set up to keep everyone straight. It must be as complicated as those used in real law enforcement to trace the progress of a case.
Also am eying P. D. James' Talking about Detective Fiction. It came in today (one of the reasons we were running around). She agrees with me about Agatha Christie's plastic characters. heh. heh. I used to be considered sacrilegious because I preferred Dorothy Sayers' mysteries to Agatha's. Christie was married to an archeologist (Murder in Mesopotamia). It was an anthropological solidarity thing, I think.
Progress: Demons. Should get the last three chapters polished tonight. So, if the sky falls on my head and an agent does ask for a full, I'll be ready to send it -- once I consolidate it into one attachment.
No. My characters don't have half the twists that O'Connell's do. But then, I'm writing about kids and gargoyles.
No. My characters don't have half the twists that O'Connell's do. But then, I'm writing about kids and gargoyles.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
